We're hiring! The Phelps Lab currently has several complementary projects funded by NIH and NSF. At the moment, we're looking for people with a strong foundation in molecular biology or genomics who are interested in social behavior.
Postdoctoral opportunity: Developing genomic tools for prairie voles. The lab was recently awarded an NSF EDGE grant for a project led by Dr. Zoe Donaldson at University of Colorado at Boulder. Our contribution will be to perform directed evolution experiments to make new AAV vectors with useful properties. We are looking for someone with an interest in social behavior and a strong record that includes mastery of molecular biology basics -- PCR, qPCR and cloning. The project itself will use advanced methods that build on these fundamentals. Experience in genomics and other molecular methods is desirable but not required.
This postdoc will also contribute to a project using DREADDs to manipulate memory and bonding in prairie voles. Trainees will have the opportunity to learn the latest in whole-mount immunohistochemistry and automated microscopy methods through our collaboration with Dr. Pavel Osten at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Additional opportunities include training and projects in genomics and field work.
Postdoctoral opportunity: Evolutionary epigenomics of behavior. We are also looking for a postdoctoral trainee to investigate the adaptive evolution of gene regulation in non-model systems. The project seeks to identify adaptations in neuronal gene regulation associated with the emergence of monogamy in prairie voles. The successful candidate will have experience with genome-wide tests of selection and comfort with standard tools of bioinformatics. This is an excellent opportunity for a recent graduate with a background in bioinformatics, phylogenetics or population genetics looking to expand into functional measures of sequence evolution, neurobiology, or animal behavior. Although not required, the applicant will have the opportunity to become proficient in a variety of advanced molecular methods, including ChIP-seq, meDIP, conformation capture and other techniques.
UT-Austin is a wonderful place to be. There is a vibrant community of researchers working at the interface of brain, behavior and evolution, an excellent sequencing facility, and extraordinary computational resources.
The lab has 2+ years of funding available for each of these positions, with subsequent years contingent on progress in the first. Pay is at the NIH standard rates. The start date is flexible, and the positions will remain posted here until filled. Applications should include a current CV along with a cover letter that provides a short (~1 page) statement of research interests and contact information for three references. Please submit applications by email to firstname.lastname@example.org, with the subject line POSTDOC APPLICATION.
If you're interested in becoming a graduate student (here or anywhere else), here are a few things to think about.
What makes a good graduate application?
The graduate school application process is arduous, time-consuming and remarkably competitive. To the applicants, it must also seem like a deeply mysterious process. Here are some tips about how prospective students are evaluated by admissions committees.
Grades: Good grades convey that you are responsible, that you manage your time well, and that you have an aptitude for the material covered in your courses. However, people who do well as undergraduates are not necessarily well-equipped for graduate school. Graduate school is a wildly different experience, where success is largely determined by how ready you are to take responsibility for your own education. A 3.5 GPA (on a 4.0 scale, so A’s and B’s) is considered good. A GPA below 3.0 would require a student that was exceptional in other more direct measures of research aptitude.
GREs: The GRE conveys an imperfect sense of your overall scholastic aptitude. Most of our students coming into EEB have scores of ~320 (verbal + quantitative) or higher. An outstanding score (330+) will earn a closer look at your application. A student with a poor verbal score (as is often the case with international students) can address this in part by being sure that the research statement shines. A combined score of 302 or lower would require a special letter to our graduate school, and rarely are the remaining portions of an application strong enough to merit this.
Letters of recommendation: A good letter will be detailed, provide insight into who you are, and be written by someone who is in a position to know your merits – preferably someone in the field you want to work. Unfortunately, most letters are either glowing or not very informative. Also, it’s pretty much impossible for you to know with any certainty how good a letter will be. If your prior mentor has a history of placing students in excellent grad programs, she or he is probably a good letter writer. If you have worked with a PI for over a year and you are on good terms. they will probably take the time to write a strong letter. It’s not a bad idea to give a letter writer a way of politely declining by saying, “If you don’t feel like you could evaluate my readiness for graduate school, or if you have reservations for any reason, I completely understand.” They might decline because they are busy, or because they couldn’t write you a strong letter. In either case, a mediocre letter won’t help you much.
Research experience: This is probably the most important aspect of your preparation. Successful applicants have often spent a year or more as lab or field assistants. This ensures a very strong letter of recommendation that speaks directly to your aptitudes as a researcher, and gives you time to mature intellectually. It also gives you time to realize what you’re getting into. The admissions committee loves to see authorship on one or more publications. Authorship characterizes the strongest applicants, but is not necessary. Authorship on posters or manuscripts in preparation is important to list on your CV, because it gives the committee evidence that you made meaningful contributions to research.
Personal statement: This goes by many names, one of which is the “personal statement," the “research narrative,” "statement of purpose," or “statement of research interests.” This is the best way the admissions committee has of evaluating your aptitudes directly. Spend a lot of time on it. Here are some tips. 1) Don’t make it too personal. Despite its title, we don’t really need to be convinced of your personal commitment to graduate school. Or maybe we do, but no amount of telling us you are interested is going to help. So omit the stories about the crayfish you kept as childhood pets, about your family trip to the zoo, or about your father who is a veterinarian. Almost every prospective biologist has some story that reflects his or her childhood experience with animals or the outdoors. Sadly, unless yours makes for particularly compelling reading, it will probably be a distraction. Worse, it can be read as evidence of intellectual immaturity. 2) Demonstrate sophistication. Want to impress the committee? Demonstrate that you can formulate interesting questions based on your reading of the scientific literature. Indicate the kinds of questions that interest you and exactly why you think they are important. Describe your own research experience in sufficient detail to make it clear that you understood what questions you were addressing. Many students who write very well nevertheless are too vague in their research statements. An excellent essay sounds like it was written by a colleague. A mediocre one sounds like it was written by an undergraduate who has done well in courses, but isn’t quite sure about what comes next. 3) Make sure the writing is clear and free of typos. Your sentences should be simple and direct. Keep them free of spelling and grammatical errors. Minimize jargon. You’re writing for professional biologists, but most will not be in your field. In a related vein - a word you learned from a thesaurus while writing your essay is almost always a bad idea. If it rings false, it will sound insincere or arrogant. 4) Start early and revise often.
In addition to your application, whether the lab PI is looking for a student with your interests and skills is also very important. In programs without formal rotations, this can be the most important determinant of whether you are admitted. So if you want to come to our lab, write us early -- generally several months before applications are due.
Are we right for you?
We try to get at the big picture by assembling information from smaller scales; you don’t have to work at all of these levels, but you have to think all of them are interesting and worthwhile. As a result, I look for students with broad interests and a passion for details. Many prospective students may be excited about one part of our work, but find other aspects either uninteresting or intimidating. If you find molecular biology to be tedious or evolution to be soft, you won't like our lab.
I look for evidence of a strong work ethic and independence – including an ability to seek out needed expertise and a willingness to press on when help is unavailable. Because our work is diverse, it is important that students work well on collaborative projects. Traits that help in collaboration include fastidiousness, curiosity, and a desire to see the best in others.
Before you apply, it is worth considering a few questions. What are you looking for in a mentor? What kind of lab environment do you want? Do you want a graduate program with rotations? How much coursework would you like to do in graduate school?
Still interested? Please read a few of our papers. If you already have and you're not dissuaded, then perhaps you should put together a CV and write me an email introducing yourself (sphelps at mail . utexas . edu). Looking forward to hearing from you!